Public Reason: Vol. 9, No. 1-2, 2017
‘What might Scheler say to Rawls?’: A Schelerian critique of Rawls’s Concept of ‘the Person’
Christopher Murphy

I argue that Rawls’s political philosophy relies on a moral conception of the person which he inherits from Kant’s conception of the person, despite Rawls’s claim that he is doing political philosophy first. Scheler’s critique of Kant contains a critique of his concept of the person and I apply this critique to Rawls’s use of it as a founding part of his political philosophy. This is done not to argue against Rawls’s politics per se, but to argue, in the light of Scheler’s phenomenology, that its theoretical foundations may be unsteady. I claim that Scheler’s concept of the person may be used either for a communitarian critique of Rawls or for a foundation to strengthen Rawls’s political conception of the person.

Key words: Kant, Scheler, Rawls, Political Philosophy, Person, Personhood, Phenomenology.

Citation

Murphy, Christopher. 2017. ‘What might Scheler say to Rawls?’: A Schelerian critique of Rawls’s Concept of ‘the Person’.Public Reason 9 (1-2): 49-60.